If an employer allows steel-toed shoes to be worn off the job, what is the employer's obligation regarding payment?

An employer's obligation regarding the payment for equipment or clothing, such as steel-toed shoes, depends on whether they are considered necessary for work duties and are required by the employer. In this case, if the employer permits steel-toed shoes to be worn off the job, it indicates that the shoes are not solely for work-related purposes, which means that the employer does not have an obligation to pay for them.

When footwear is specifically mandated for safety and work conditions, employers typically cover the cost, recognizing their responsibility to provide necessary protective equipment. However, if the shoes can be used in non-work scenarios, the employer is not required to bear the expense. This policy upholds the distinction between employer-provided equipment necessary strictly for job performance and personal items that may have dual-use capability.

Therefore, since the guidance specifies that the employer allows wearing the shoes off the job, it confirms that their obligation for payment is effectively nullified.